IARC carcinogen scale (Allgemein)
Only some of us are suitably sensitive to RF-EMF exposures to develop cancer. Don't mix it up with the EHS phenomenon.
This is an important note to avoid confusion.
What are pre-conditions, genetic and epi-genetic, that make some of us more sensitive? We don't know because we refuse to study it.
This fits the rare sensitivity of people who suffer a thrombosis after an Astra-Zeneca vaccination.
There is no group 1B in IARC carcinogenicity scale. There are only: 1, 2A, 2B, 3 and 4.
Right, I wrote nonsense in the opening post.
--
Jedes komplexe Problem hat eine Lösung, die einfach, naheliegend, plausibel – und falsch ist.
– Frei nach Henry Louis Mencken (1880–1956) –
gesamter Thread:
- Big News: Chris Portier hält EMF für wahrscheinlich karzinogen -
H. Lamarr,
17.03.2021, 21:09
- Portier ignoriert Lerchls Tumorstudien - H. Lamarr, 17.03.2021, 23:36
- USA: Murray ./. Motorola - Unklare Beweismittelzulassung - KlaKla, 18.03.2021, 07:23
- Chris Portiers Fleck auf der weißen Weste - H. Lamarr, 18.03.2021, 23:09
- IARC carcinogen scale -
Dariusz Leszczynski,
22.03.2021, 09:29
- IARC carcinogen scale - H. Lamarr, 22.03.2021, 11:27